Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2004
Abstract
Nonindustrial private forestland (NIPF) landowners in Mississippi who recently harvested timber were surveyed to examine their regeneration behavior. Differences between regenerators and nonregenerators were investigated by looking at the different factors affecting reforestation decisions. A discriminant analysis was used to identify factors that were useful in differentiating between regenerators and nonregenerators. Ownership size; sociodemographic characteristics such as income, education, place of residence, and age; awareness of existing government incentive/assistance programs; and participation in educational programs were significant variables in differentiating between regenerators and nonregenerators. Landowners who own larger timberlands had a higher propensity to engage in regeneration activities after harvests. This also was true for landowners who had higher income levels and educational attainment, and were younger, city resident, and white. Landowners who were aware of existing government incentive/assistance programs and those who participated in educational programs also were more likely to participate in pine regeneration. Landowners in Mississippi considered both ecological and economic reasons as highly important considerations in their decision to regenerate. The belief that the land would reforest itself to pine naturally, the high cost of reforestation, and lack of information on reforestation options were top reasons cited by landowners for their decision not to regenerate. South. J. Appl. For. 28(4):189 –195
Repository Citation
Arano, Kathryn G.; Munn, Ian A.; Gunter, John E.; Bullard, Steven H.; and Doolittle, Max L., "Comparison Between Regenerators and Non-Regenerators in Mississippi: A Discriminant Analysis" (2004). Faculty Publications. 61.
https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/forestry/61
Comments
Arano, K.G., I.A. Munn, J.E. Gunter, S.H. Bullard, and M. L. Doolittle. 2004. Comparison between regenerators and non-regenerators in Mississippi: A discriminant analysis. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 28(4):189-195.