Home > College of Liberal and Applied Arts > Anthropology, Geography, and Sociology > Index of Texas Archaeology > Vol.
Agency
Caddo Archeology Journal
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.1996.1.14
Abstract
Although Brooks seems to agree with me that the archeology of the Arkansas Valley requires a new paradigm, he clearly believes that mine -- which he apparently considers a poorly founded Binfordian screed written primarily for its shock value -- is not the one. Where, according to Brooks, have I gone wrong in my work on the archeology of the Arkansas Valley? Which of my generalizations does he consider so poorly grounded empirically as to suggest, as he insinuates, professionally and perhaps even ethically questionable work, and in what ways does he consider them deficient?
Repository Citation
Schambach, Frank
(1996)
"Continuing the Discussion of the Spiroans and Their Entrepots: A Reply to Brooks's Critique of My New Paradigm/or the Archeology of the Arkansas Valley,"
Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1996
, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.1996.1.14
ISSN: 2475-9333
Available at:
https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1996/iss1/14
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, United States History Commons
Tell us how this article helped you.